Asked before sealing, answered with math.
These are the questions every first-time visitor brings. AION is strange on purpose: no dashboard, no master key, no rescue button hidden under the founder’s desk. Short answers first; the longer doctrine lives in the architecture, threat-model, and audit chapters.
Why four of seven? Why not just give me the cipher key?
You don’t hold a separate cipher key. The four phrases are how the cipher key gets reconstructed — there is no complete key stored anywhere on this earth.
A single key is a single point of failure. Lose it, lose the vault. Get hacked, lose the vault. Get coerced, lose the vault. The four-of-seven threshold solves three problems at once:
- Loss survival.You can lose up to three shards — a trustee’s death, a basement fire, a cousin’s exile, a USB stick at the bottom of a drawer — and still recover. Seven exist so the four can come from anywhere.
- Coercion resistance.No single trustee can open the vault unilaterally. They would need to compel three others — and in AION’s doctrine, those others live in different sovereign jurisdictions.
- Mathematical opacity below threshold. Three shards reveal zero information about the secret. Not 3/7ths. Not a partial brute-force advantage. None.Every possible secret is equally likely to whoever holds three. That’s a property of Shamir over GF(2⁸), not a policy choice.
What if one trustee loses their shard?
Nothing happens. With four-of-seven you can lose up to three shards and the vault still opens — death, dementia, lost USB sticks, broken phones, all anticipated and survivable.
Each shard alone looks like cryptographic noise. It isn’t a partial key; it’s a point on a polynomial whose curve only resolves when the fourth point arrives.
What if four shards are lost and only three remain?
Then the vault is gone, unless you created a separate recovery artifact before the loss. Three shards do not open a four-of-seven vault. Not with support. Not with a court order. Not with the founder. Not with an AION server.
This is the price of having no backdoor. If AION could recover a four-of-seven vault from only three shards, then AION would secretly hold another key, a hidden shard, or a master recovery path. That would make the whole promise false.
Four-of-seven is a chosen balance: it lets three holders fail, die, refuse, forget, or lose their envelope while preventing any three holders from opening the vault behind your back. If your life needs more loss tolerance, the honest answer is a different threshold design before sealing — for example a future three-of-seven, four-of-nine, or five-of-eleven policy — not a fake rescue path after the threshold has already failed. The public prototype today is intentionally fixed at four-of-seven.
AION’s recovery plan is maintenance, not magic: periodic shard checks, trustee replacement while the holder is alive, resealing after a relationship changes, and keeping an optional encrypted Recovery Kit in a separate place. Below threshold, mathematics is doing exactly what it promised: refusing to open.
What if AION the company disappears?
The protocol survives the company. AION is built the way Bitcoin and Tor were built — as math anyone can run, not a service anyone has to keep running.
If AION goes away, your heir opens the vault three ways: with recovery.html (a self-contained file that runs in any browser, offline, with no AION server) — the Recovery Kit they download at sealing time bundles it; with aion_unseal.py, a 461-line Python reference any system with cryptography can run; or by re-implementing the math from public, audited primitives — Shamir over GF(2⁸) and AES-256-GCM. None of these paths require AION to exist.
Why is there no dashboard or “my vaults” page?
Because a dashboard is a map of what the company knows. AION should not know enough to draw that map.
A normal SaaS dashboard says: here are your records on our server. AION says the opposite: your vault is not our possession. You hold the Vault Packet, the Recovery Kit, and the envelopes. The company should not be able to list your secrets, count your vaults, or build a little museum of your private life.
So no generic /dashboard. No “recent vaults.” No profile picture beside your inheritance. That is not minimalism. That is the security model wearing a nice coat.
If the vault works without AION, why would anyone pay?
They do not pay because the math needs rent. The math is free to run. They pay when they want AION to do continuing work while they are not thinking about it.
Paid service means check-ins, trustee and heir coordination, encrypted blob mirroring, recovery-kit re-issuance, audit chain storage, support, and eventually multi-jurisdiction custody. The vault works without AION; the continuity service works because AION stays on watch.
Think less “Netflix for secrets” and more safe deposit box, registered agent, estate review, fire insurance. You do not open the safe every morning for entertainment. If you do, different problem.
Why come to AION instead of Casa, Vault12, or a hardware wallet?
Because AION is not trying to be the app where your legacy lives. It is trying to be the ceremony that creates artifacts your family can still use after the app is gone.
Casa, Vault12, and hardware-wallet backups are serious products. The primitives are not the moat. Shamir is not magic dust. Dead-man switches are not rare. The difference AION is trying to own is this:
Your heir should be able to open the vault even if the company, the server, the founder, and the login page have all disappeared.
AION wins only if that sentence is true in practice. If it is just branding, it deserves to lose.
Is AION supposed to be addictive?
No. A vault product should not behave like a slot machine in a velvet jacket.
The repeat loop is reassurance, not addiction: annual review, trustee drill, heir contact check, recovery-kit reprint, reseal after a major life event, and proof that someone else can open the vault without the company.
A good AION user does not visit every day. They seal carefully, test the recovery path, update it when life changes, and sleep better. The product should be memorable, not needy.
Can someone steal my vault by hacking AION?
AION never sees your plaintext. Encryption happens in your browser; the cipher key is split locally; the seven shards live with seven holders not on AION servers. Even with full access to AION’s infrastructure, an attacker holds only ciphertexts.
To break those, they would need to compromise four of seven distinct trustees in different sovereign jurisdictions simultaneously — and convince a working AES-256-GCM implementation to give up authenticated bytes. That is not a hack. That is a coalition.
Seven trustees? I do not have seven people I trust.
The seven are not all friends. They are seven independent places a shard can live. A trustee is a role, not always a person:
- A sister, a lawyer, an oldest friend.
- A safe deposit box at a bank in a different city.
- An engraved steel plate welded inside a bookcase.
- An emailed copy under a passphrase only your heir would know.
- A copy you keep yourself, in a private drawer.
The math doesn’t see "people." It sees seven distinct holders. Diversity of kind matters more than the social label.
Will my photo or file look the same when my heir opens it?
Text and small files (under 1 MiB): byte-identical. AES-256-GCM authenticates the contents — if a single byte were altered along the way, the unseal fails rather than returning corrupted data.
Photos over 1 MiB: AION caps file size at 1 MiB so the encrypted ciphertext fits across paper-QR, synthetic-quartz, and DNA storage tiers. For oversized images, AION offers a resize beforesealing with a side-by-side preview — you decide whether to commit to the resized version or pick a different file. Your original is never modified. AION cannot recover what isn’t sealed; what the sealer commits is what the heir receives.
What about quantum computers breaking AES?
AES-256 is post-quantum-conservative. Grover’s algorithm halves the effective key length, leaving 128 bits of security — still infeasible to brute-force on any silicon physics currently makes possible.
AION’s migration to CRYSTALS-Kyber (a lattice-based KEM) is locked for end of 2026. Math is one of seven layers; the others — geography, time, memory, trust, physical, sky — defeat different attacks. A quantum break against AES alone does not open the vault if the other six layers hold.
Can I change what I sealed after sealing it?
No. Sealing is cryptographically irreversible. You can seal a new vault, but the contents of an existing vault cannot be rewritten.
This is a property, not a limitation. It is what makes the seal hold against a future you being coerced, impersonated, or deepfaked into altering what was meant for an heir. The vault is a one-way door.
What if my heir doesn't know they need to find four of seven?
Two answers, both already shipped.
The Recovery Kit. A single .zip you download at sealing time, containing the universal opener (recovery.html), the encrypted Vault Packet (vault-packet.json), and a plain-text instruction sheet that says, in so many words: open recovery.html, drop the packet, paste any four envelopes. Designed to be printable.
The public recovery tool at aion.org/recovery.html. A byte-identical HTML file for every vault. A copy from 2026 will open a vault sealed in 2055. Linked from the footer of every page on this site.